Taste of the Wild vs Blue Buffalo: Which Dog Food Is Better?

Taste of the Wild and Blue Buffalo are both popular natural-positioned brands that lean on a natural, protein-first message, but they take different paths. Taste of the Wild is famous for novel proteins like bison, venison, and roasted boar, and it is a grain-free favorite. Blue Buffalo is famous for real meat first, LifeSource Bits, and a big range that includes both grain-free and grain-inclusive recipes.

I compared them on ingredients, protein, grain-free options, and which dogs actually do better on each. The honest headline is that Taste of the Wild offers more exotic proteins for allergy-prone dogs, while Blue Buffalo offers a wider range and a stronger natural brand story.

How We Select Products: I compare manufacturer specifications and analyse hundreds of verified buyer reviews on Amazon. I highlight real trade-offs, who each product suits best, and why alternatives were excluded, with no fabricated hands-on testing. You can read more about the process on our how we review page.
Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, PawPicks earns a small commission at no extra cost to you. This never influences which products we recommend.
Quick Answer: For dogs that need a novel protein or a grain-free recipe, Taste of the Wild is the stronger pick because it offers bison, venison, and other exotic proteins. Blue Buffalo is the better all-rounder for owners who want a wide range of grain-inclusive and grain-free options from a well-known natural brand. See Taste of the Wild price ›

Two Natural Brands, Two Angles

Both brands market themselves as natural, protein-first dog food, which puts them in the same mental aisle for many owners. But the angles are different. Taste of the Wild built its reputation on novel, roasted meats: bison, venison, wild boar, and salmon. Blue Buffalo built its reputation on deboned chicken, whole grains and vegetables, and the LifeSource vitamin blend. One is exotic; the other is wholesome.

The result is that the two brands attract different dogs. Taste of the Wild is often chosen when a dog has struggled with chicken or other common proteins, since its recipes use novel proteins. Blue Buffalo is the go-to for owners who want a dependable natural food with real meat first and a brand they recognize from every pet aisle.

Neither of these is a clinical brand, and the adequacy statement on the back is where that shows up. What that line means is worth two minutes before you choose.

Ingredients Compared

AspectTaste of the WildBlue Buffalo
First ingredientNovel meat (bison, venison)Deboned chicken or fish
Typical proteinCheck the guaranteed analysisCheck the guaranteed analysis
Grain-freeMostly grain-freeBoth grain-free and grain-inclusive
Novel proteinsMany (bison, venison, boar)Few (Basics line)
Recipe rangeNovel-protein and grain-free focusWide grain-free and grain-inclusive range
SignatureRoasted exotic meatsLifeSource Bits

Protein levels vary by recipe, so compare the guaranteed analysis on each bag. Taste of the Wild is predominantly grain-free, with a strong lineup of novel proteins that can be used in elimination trials. Blue Buffalo is more moderate, with a broader range that includes grain-inclusive recipes for owners who prefer to avoid grain-free. Both use real meat as the first ingredient.

Protein and Novel Protein Advantage

If you suspect a chicken allergy, Taste of the Wild offers bison and venison, which are less common in dog food than chicken. That is one way to run an elimination trial.[1] Blue Buffalo's Wilderness line is also high-protein, but it leans on chicken in many recipes. The Basics limited ingredient line from Blue Buffalo is the exception, offering turkey, salmon, and lamb.

Range and Brand Story

Taste of the Wild concentrates on novel proteins and grain-free recipes. Blue Buffalo Life Protection spreads across a wider range of proteins and grain choices.

Blue Buffalo offers a stronger brand story and a wider range, not necessarily better nutrition. If the natural story matters to you, that is a fair reason to choose it. If you want a grain-free novel protein food, Taste of the Wild is the more focused choice.

Which Dog Should Choose Which

Choose Taste of the Wild if your dog has food sensitivities, if you want a grain-free recipe with a novel protein, or if you want a high-protein recipe. It is one option for dogs with suspected food allergies.

Choose Blue Buffalo if you want a recognizable natural brand with a wide range, if your dog does fine on chicken, or if you prefer a grain-inclusive recipe with the LifeSource vitamin blend.

The Sensitive Dog Question

For a dog with suspected food allergies, this comparison matters more than most. Elimination-provocation trials remain the standard way to diagnose food reactions in the skin, and a novel protein is one the dog has not eaten before.[1] The bison and venison in High Prairie are examples. Blue Buffalo's Basics line offers the same idea with turkey, salmon, or lamb, but the brand's main Life Protection and Wilderness lines lean on chicken.

The practical recommendation: if you suspect chicken is the problem, start with Taste of the Wild High Prairie or Pacific Stream. Run the food alone for at least eight weeks, keep treats on the same protein, and track symptoms in a journal.[1] If the signs improve, a vet can help confirm the trigger. Our allergy and itchy skin guide walks through the full elimination trial process.

How to Switch Between Them

Because both brands offer high-protein, grain-free recipes, the switch is usually smooth, but go slowly. Mix the new food in gradually over several days. If your dog has been on a chicken-based food and you are moving to a novel protein, watch for any sign of digestive upset in the first week and slow the transition if needed.

What Owners Report

Some Taste of the Wild owners report that their dog's itching eased or its coat improved after switching to a novel protein. The brand also gets praise for delivering a grain-free, high-protein food built on novel proteins. The main criticisms are that some dogs do not love the taste of bison and venison, and that the grain-free positioning is not right for every dog.

Blue Buffalo owners praise the dependable quality and the brand's commitment to real meat and no chicken by-product meal. The reviews skew positive on palatability, with many owners reporting their dog eats it eagerly. Between the two, Taste of the Wild is the pick for novel proteins, and Blue Buffalo is the pick for a recognizable natural brand.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Taste of the Wild better than Blue Buffalo?+
It depends on the dog. Taste of the Wild offers more novel proteins and grain-free options. Blue Buffalo offers a wider range and brand recognition. For dogs with suspected food allergies, Taste of the Wild is one option to try in an elimination trial; for a general natural food, either works.
Is Taste of the Wild a good quality dog food?+

Yes. Taste of the Wild is a well-regarded grain-free brand with real meat first, high protein, and novel protein sources. It has been a top seller for years and has a strong base of positive owner reviews.

How do the ranges of Taste of the Wild and Blue Buffalo differ?+

Taste of the Wild is built around novel proteins such as bison and venison, with many grain-free recipes. Blue Buffalo has the wider range, covering both grain-free and grain-inclusive recipes.

Which is better for a dog with chicken allergies?+
Taste of the Wild is one option for an elimination trial, because its High Prairie and other recipes use bison and venison rather than chicken.[1] Blue Buffalo's Basics line is also a good option for single-protein trials. In a published review, beef, dairy, chicken and wheat were the most likely food allergens in dogs.[2]
Is Taste of the Wild grain-free?+

Most Taste of the Wild recipes are grain-free, using sweet potato and legumes instead of corn, wheat, or soy. Blue Buffalo offers both grain-free (Wilderness) and grain-inclusive (Life Protection) lines.

The Bottom Line

Taste of the Wild and Blue Buffalo are both quality natural dog foods with different strengths. Taste of the Wild delivers novel proteins, grain-free recipes. Blue Buffalo delivers a wider range, a stronger natural brand story, and a recognizable name.

If your dog has food sensitivities or you want a grain-free, novel-protein food, Taste of the Wild is one option to consider. If you want a dependable natural food from a brand you trust and your dog does fine on common proteins, Blue Buffalo is excellent.

See Taste of the Wild on Amazon
About Liv
Co-founder & Lead Reviewer, PawPicks · Haarlem, Netherlands

I live in Haarlem with two dogs, Teddy and Bear, and a cat called Fountain. Seven years of that, and most of what I know I learned by getting it wrong first. I grew up watching my parents buy whatever was on the shelf for our animals, and it never seemed to occur to anyone that the choice mattered. It does. I co-founded PawPicks so that you can check before you buy instead of after, and I say plainly when a popular pick is not worth your money.

More about Liv →

References

  1. Olivry T, Mueller RS, Prélaud P. Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (1): duration of elimination diets. BMC Vet Res, 2015. PubMed
  2. Mueller RS, Olivry T, Prélaud P. Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res, 2016. PubMed